Insights / Privilege & Risk Management

Privilege & Risk Management

Legal Professional Privilege

A Practical Guide for Construction and Infrastructure Businesses

C&IDS | July 2026Steven Hunt - Solicitor of England & Wales~15 min read

Executive Summary

Legal professional privilege (LPP) is one of the most powerful protections available to any business facing a dispute or regulatory investigation. It shields your internal legal analysis, expert work product and strategy from disclosure - but only if it has been properly generated and maintained.

This guide explains what LPP is, how it operates under English law, what equivalent protection is available in the UAE, and how to structure your legal arrangements to achieve the maximum possible protection even where your engagement is governed by UAE law.

Key Action Points

  1. Appoint a qualified lawyer as your in-house legal adviser - not a consultant or commercial manager.
  2. Define who within your organisation is the client for privilege purposes.
  3. Keep legal advice strictly separate from commercial input in all written communications.
  4. Instruct technical experts through your legal function, not directly through your commercial team.
  5. If operating in the UAE, ring-fence your legal advice engagement under English law or DIFC law.
  6. Include express privilege provisions in your arbitration clause.
  7. Conduct a privilege audit before any disclosure exercise, data room or regulatory inquiry.
  8. Never make a strategic disclosure of selected privileged documents without legal advice.

1. What Is Legal Professional Privilege?

LPP is the rule that protects certain categories of document from disclosure obligations. There are two distinct types:

Privilege is a right that belongs to the client. It must be actively claimed and, once lost through waiver, generally cannot be recovered.

Key Point:

Privilege does not arise automatically. It must be generated in the right form, by the right person, for the right purpose - and then actively maintained.


2. LPP Under English Law

2.1 How Legal Advice Privilege Is Generated

Three conditions must be met: the communication must be confidential; it must be made for the purpose of giving or receiving legal advice;3 and the person giving the advice must be a qualified lawyer acting in a legal capacity.4 A 2026 clarification from the English Commercial Court confirmed that internal documents prepared for the dominant purpose of obtaining legal advice can also attract privilege, even where no lawyer is the author.5

2.2 The Dual-Hat Problem

Where communications serve both legal and commercial purposes, the question is whether the dominant purpose was legal advice.6 Documents generated in a commercial role will not attract LAP.7 Board papers and management reports which bundle legal commentary with operational content are vulnerable.8 Only those authorised to seek and receive legal advice are the client for privilege purposes.9

2.3 Litigation Privilege in Construction Disputes

Litigation privilege attaches when litigation or arbitration becomes a real and serious prospect.10 The Court of Appeal has confirmed it can apply to internal investigation documents even before formal proceedings are commenced.11 All expert instruction should be routed through your legal function.12

Common Mistake:

Construction businesses frequently instruct quantum and delay experts directly through commercial teams, then attempt to claim privilege. Courts and tribunals will scrutinise this carefully.

2.4 Waiver: How Privilege Is Lost

2.5 Without Prejudice Communications

Without prejudice privilege is separate from LPP and frequently confused with it.16 It protects communications made in a genuine attempt to settle a dispute. The protection is not created by labelling a document Without Prejudice.


3. LPP - or Its Equivalent - Under UAE Law

3.1 The Onshore Position: No Common Law Privilege

Onshore UAE does not recognise LPP as understood in English law. The UAE Advocacy Law (Article 42) and Code of Ethics for Advocates (Article 3C) impose a duty of confidentiality on the lawyer17 - a materially different protection. English LPP is the client right to withhold a document. UAE confidentiality is the lawyer professional duty not to disclose.18

UAE Risk:

If your legal advice is generated by a lawyer operating under UAE onshore governance, the protection you believe you have may not be recognised in onshore proceedings or regulatory investigations.

3.2 DIFC and ADGM: A Materially Better Position

Both recognise legal professional privilege under their own common law procedural regimes, closely aligned with English law.19 For businesses with DIFC or ADGM contracts or arbitration, English LPP is fully available.

3.3 International Arbitration: Where Privilege Matters Most

The IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence expressly protect privileged documents: tribunals must exclude from any production order documents protected by privilege under applicable law.20 Privilege is determined by reference to the law governing the document creation, not the seat of arbitration.21

Key Point:

Generating privilege at source - under English law, through a qualified solicitor - is your most effective protection in international arbitration.

3.4 Common Interest Privilege in UAE Joint Ventures

Under UAE law, co-claimants must agree to common interest privilege in writing.22 Sharing privileged material with a non-co-claimant may constitute implicit waiver.


4. Maximising Protection Where Your Engagement Is Governed by UAE Law

4.1 Ring-Fence the Legal Advice Engagement Under English Law

The fractional legal adviser is engaged under a standalone legal services retainer, governed by English law. All legal advice is issued under that retainer, and privilege can be asserted in any international arbitration on that basis.

4.2 Use a DIFC or ADGM Entity for the Legal Engagement

Engaging your legal adviser through a DIFC or ADGM entity means the engagement is governed by DIFC or ADGM law19 - communications with a DIFC-admitted lawyer attract full common law LPP.

4.3 Strengthen the Arbitration Clause

Specify English law as the substantive law. Adopt the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence.20 Include an express provision that privilege shall be determined by reference to English law. Specify ICC, LCIA or DIAC as the institutional rules.

4.4 Contractual Confidentiality as a Baseline

A robust confidentiality clause provides a contractual basis for resisting disclosure in arbitral proceedings.23 Not equivalent to LPP but in international arbitration it has real effect.

4.5 The Recommended Structure

Key Point:

This structure will not protect you in UAE onshore courts. But most significant GCC construction disputes resolve in international arbitration - and in that forum, this structure is robust and enforceable.


Conclusion

LPP is a strategic asset - not a technicality. The ability to analyse your position candidly, instruct experts confidentially and develop strategy without exposure to your counterparty or tribunal can be decisive. That asset must be created and maintained deliberately.

A fractional in-house appointment from C&IDS provides the senior construction law expertise to build and manage that privilege framework from day one.

Want to discuss your privilege position?

Contact C&IDS to discuss how a fractional in-house appointment can be structured for your business.

Book a Free Discovery Call

Authorities

  1. 1.Balabel v Air India [1988] Ch 317 (CA)
  2. 2.Waugh v British Railways Board [1980] AC 521 (HL)
  3. 3.Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England (No 5) [2003] QB 1556 (CA); Three Rivers (No 6) [2004] UKHL 48
  4. 4.R (Prudential plc) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax [2013] UKSC 1
  5. 5.Aabar Holdings S.a r.l. v Glencore plc [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm) (first-instance, subject to appeal)
  6. 6.Civil Aviation Authority v Jet2.com Ltd [2020] EWCA Civ 35
  7. 7.Three Rivers (No 5) [2003] QB 1556; Three Rivers (No 6) [2004] UKHL 48, per Lord Scott at [61]-[63]
  8. 8.WH Holding Ltd v E20 Stadium LLP [2018] EWCA Civ 2652
  9. 9.RBS Rights Issue Litigation [2016] EWHC 3161 (Ch)
  10. 10.Re Highgrade Traders Ltd [1984] BCLC 151 (CA); West London Pipeline v Total UK Ltd [2008] EWHC 1729 (Comm)
  11. 11.Director of the SFO v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2006
  12. 12.Waugh v British Railways Board applied to expert reports; Thanki (ed), The Law of Privilege (3rd edn, 2018), Ch 4
  13. 13.Paragon Finance plc v Freshfields [1999] 1 WLR 1183 (CA)
  14. 14.Property Alliance Group Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2015] EWHC 1557 (Ch)
  15. 15.Fulham Leisure Holdings Ltd v Nicholson Graham and Jones [2006] EWHC 158 (Ch); Thanki, Ch 5
  16. 16.Rush and Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council [1989] AC 1280 (HL)
  17. 17.Federal Law No. 23 of 1991 (UAE Advocacy Law), Art 42; Code of Ethics for Advocates, Art 3C
  18. 18.Bird and Bird LLP, Legal Privilege Q and A: UAE, Disputes+ Know-How Brief (2020)
  19. 19.DIFC Court Rules, Part 28; ADGM Courts, Civil Evidence, Judgments, Enforcement and Judicial Appointments Regulations 2015
  20. 20.IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (2020), Art 9.2(b)
  21. 21.Thanki (ed), The Law of Privilege (3rd edn, 2018), Ch 8; Born, International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, 2021) Vol II, pp 2465-2470
  22. 22.Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer (No 3) [1981] QB 223 (CA); Bird and Bird (2020) op cit
  23. 23.Thanki, The Law of Privilege (3rd edn, 2018), Ch 8; Born, International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, 2021) Vol II, pp 2470-2475

This article is published for general information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. C&IDS is a UK limited company (No. 11789861). Steven Hunt is a Solicitor of England and Wales.